OK, thanks.
Jason
Hi,
On 07/10/2013 02:40 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 07/09/2013 07:46 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Daniel noticed that, per to the resolution of DR195, we shouldn't warn
in c++11 mode, not even with -pedantic, for this kind of
reinterpret_cast (*). Straightforward change tested x86_64-linux, not
sur
On 07/09/2013 07:46 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Daniel noticed that, per to the resolution of DR195, we shouldn't warn
in c++11 mode, not even with -pedantic, for this kind of
reinterpret_cast (*). Straightforward change tested x86_64-linux, not
sure if we want to do something slightly different for
Hi,
Daniel noticed that, per to the resolution of DR195, we shouldn't warn
in c++11 mode, not even with -pedantic, for this kind of
reinterpret_cast (*). Straightforward change tested x86_64-linux, not
sure if we want to do something slightly different for C++98, or
something more.
Thanks,
