Hi,
On 06/28/2013 08:58 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/28/2013 12:58 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
If you like, this is the rationale behind my last patch: save its
current value, set it only to force a thorough
deduce_noexcept_on_destructor on everything (admittedly, I don't
understand all the deta
On 06/28/2013 12:58 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
If you like, this is the rationale behind my last patch: save its
current value, set it only to force a thorough
deduce_noexcept_on_destructor on everything (admittedly, I don't
understand all the details of this), and then restore it, don't fiddle
at
Hi,
On 06/28/2013 02:52 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/19/2013 08:22 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
If, in check_bases_and_members, I simply move
deduce_noexcept_on_destructors after check_methods and nothing else, all
the new testcases are fine + the tests added for Core/1123, but there
are regressi
On 06/19/2013 08:22 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
If, in check_bases_and_members, I simply move
deduce_noexcept_on_destructors after check_methods and nothing else, all
the new testcases are fine + the tests added for Core/1123, but there
are regressions, for example for testcases involving virtual
de
Hi,
this is a better fix for this regression, IMHO. Certainly it's simple
and passes the extended testcase, thus tests for defaulted destructors
too, etc, with no regressions. The idea, which I got studying in detail
check_bases_and_members and its comments, is setting temporarily
TYPE_HAS_NO
Hi again,
On 06/19/2013 03:37 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
when I implemented Core/1123 "Destructors should be noexcept by
default", unfortunately I caused this regression, present now in
mainline and 4_8-branch.
When the destructor is user provided, with no exception
specifications, and t
Hi,
when I implemented Core/1123 "Destructors should be noexcept by
default", unfortunately I caused this regression, present now in
mainline and 4_8-branch.
When the destructor is user provided, with no exception specifications,
and the type has data members (not bases, those are already Ok
