OK.
Jason
Hi again,
On 06/13/2013 03:51 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Perhaps we should hand off to build_static_cast in the case described
by the comment, rather than duplicate the logic.
Thus I have regression tested successfully the below.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/cp
2013-06-13 Paolo
Hi,
Jason Merrill ha scritto:
>On 06/12/2013 08:49 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> +/* Add any qualifier conversions. */
>> +return build_nop (type, expr);
>
>For a cast to reference type, this will produce an rvalue rather than
>an lvalue.
Ah, thanks a lot for the clarification. Admitte
On 06/12/2013 08:49 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ /* Add any qualifier conversions. */
+ return build_nop (type, expr);
For a cast to reference type, this will produce an rvalue rather than an
lvalue.
Perhaps we should hand off to build_static_cast in the case described by
the com
... in any case, I propose to also add to /cpp0x this testcase suggested
by Daniel.
Thanks,
Paolo.
7
Index: g++.dg/cpp0x/dyncast1.C
===
--- g++.dg/cpp0x/dyncast1.C (revision 0)
+++ g++.dg/cpp0x/dyncast1.C (w
Hi,
this dynamic_cast bug, which just came in, notices that in the simple
case of static conversion we forget to perform the cv-qualifier
conversions. It seems to me that we are missing a build_nop.
I extended quite a bit the testcase, to references too, because at some
point I got those wro
