Hi,
Jason Merrill ha scritto:
>For EXPR_PACK_EXPANSION we can just return true; a pack expansion is
>always dependent, on the number of arguments if nothing else.
Thanks. I suspected that ;) Then I'm going to test the corresponding very
simple patch and commit it.
Thanks again!
Paolo
For EXPR_PACK_EXPANSION we can just return true; a pack expansion is
always dependent, on the number of arguments if nothing else.
Jason
Hi,
in this old (Jakub figured out it already existed in 2007!) ICE on
invalid, the problem happens in type_dependent_expression_p: the code
for unknown_type_node as TREE_TYPE of the expression doesn't handle
EXPR_PACK_EXPANSION as TREE_CODE.
It seems to me that we simply have to look inside
