OK.
Jason
Hi,
On 01/03/2013 10:56 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 01/03/2013 05:44 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ /* C++11 - 2.5 p3, bullet 2. */
Please flesh out this comment some more.
Ok, I extended it like this.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
Index: gcc/cp/parser.c
===
On 01/03/2013 05:44 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ /* C++11 - 2.5 p3, bullet 2. */
Please flesh out this comment some more.
Jason
Hi,
On 01/02/2013 11:07 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:27:40PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
--- gcc/cp/parser.c (revision 192887)
+++ gcc/cp/parser.c (working copy)
@@ -12655,9 +12655,8 @@ cp_parser_template_id (cp_parser *parser,
/* Otherwise, emit an e
Hi!
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:27:40PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> --- gcc/cp/parser.c (revision 192887)
> +++ gcc/cp/parser.c (working copy)
> @@ -12655,9 +12655,8 @@ cp_parser_template_id (cp_parser *parser,
>/* Otherwise, emit an error about the invalid digraph, but continue
>
Hi,
as pointed out in the audit trail, my first patch for this C++11 parsing
issue was misguided: I changed cp_parser_template_id but in fact C++11
wants new special *lexing* rules, which must be active outside templates
too, as the additional test (and the old manded one) shows. Thus the belo
On 09/25/2012 06:47 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
if I understand correctly, in C++11 mode we should simply accept what we
used to accept only with -fpermissive.
Let's also mention -std=c++11 as an alternative to -fpermissive in the
note. OK with that change.
Jason
Hi,
if I understand correctly, in C++11 mode we should simply accept what we
used to accept only with -fpermissive.
Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
//
/cp
2012-09-25 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/54526
* parser.c (cp_parser_template_id): In C++11 mode simpl
