OK.
Jason
Hi,
On 08/14/2014 04:18 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 08/14/2014 07:14 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ nparms -= variadic_p ? variadic_p : default_p;
What if you have both default arguments and parameter packs?
Right. Got distracted by the minor secondary issues...
It seems to me that
On 08/14/2014 07:14 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ nparms -= variadic_p ? variadic_p : default_p;
What if you have both default arguments and parameter packs?
Jason
Hi,
this is a diagnostic issue about the error message for a wrong number of
template arguments vs default arguments. The fix is simple but also
replacing the second error with a default, as recommended by Manuel in
the audit trail, means that we have to adjust a few existing testcases.
Note,
