OK.
Jason
On 07/31/2012 12:42 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 07/30/2012 06:26 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ if ((cxx_dialect == cxx98)
+ || (TREE_CODE (decl) != FUNCTION_DECL && is_primary))
We shouldn't do this check for non-primary templates in C++98 mode,
either.
Yes. Thus the below also passes tes
On 07/30/2012 06:26 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ if ((cxx_dialect == cxx98)
+ || (TREE_CODE (decl) != FUNCTION_DECL && is_primary))
We shouldn't do this check for non-primary templates in C++98 mode, either.
Jason
Hi,
On 07/30/2012 10:10 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 07/28/2012 11:28 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
as the testcase shows (merge of 53624 & 54104), in case of local types
(possibly synthesized for a lambda) we check for the default template
arguments of the synthesized template parameters according t
On 07/28/2012 11:28 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
as the testcase shows (merge of 53624 & 54104), in case of local types
(possibly synthesized for a lambda) we check for the default template
arguments of the synthesized template parameters according to the rules
for *types* (instead of those for funct
Hi,
as the testcase shows (merge of 53624 & 54104), in case of local types
(possibly synthesized for a lambda) we check for the default template
arguments of the synthesized template parameters according to the rules
for *types* (instead of those for functions) and we spuriously reject.
As fa
