On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Thanks Gaby. Then I guess I'm going to commit the variant with NULL_TREE, I
> like it a tad better because after all formally these functions return
> trees. And consistently I change another instance only a few lines above.
OK. Thanks;
--
On 05/11/2012 04:48 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
an ICE on invalid (per Daniel's analysis): when r is NULL_TREE the next
DECL_CONTEXT (r) can only crash. Plus a garbled error message because
pp_cxx_simple_type_specifier doesn't handle BO
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> an ICE on invalid (per Daniel's analysis): when r is NULL_TREE the next
> DECL_CONTEXT (r) can only crash. Plus a garbled error message because
> pp_cxx_simple_type_specifier doesn't handle BOUND_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM.
>
> Tested x86
Hi,
an ICE on invalid (per Daniel's analysis): when r is NULL_TREE the next
DECL_CONTEXT (r) can only crash. Plus a garbled error message because
pp_cxx_simple_type_specifier doesn't handle BOUND_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM.
Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
///
/cp
201
