I made a few formatting tweaks as follows, and checked in the patch.
Thanks!
Jason
commit 3e01e07381cdb16727fe6011202372ebcdfc
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Thu Oct 27 17:44:39 2011 -0400
cleanup
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl2.c b/gcc/cp/decl2.c
index 1e514af..be9044b 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/d
The new testcase:
Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-inlines-hidden-4.C
===
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-inlines-hidden-4.C
(revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/visibility/fvisibility-
The comment is still valid now.
r
gcc/Changelog:
2011-10-25 Roberto Agostino Vitillo
PR c++/30066
* doc/invoke.texi (fvisibility-inlines-hidden): Documentation change.
gcc/c-family/Changelog:
2011-10-25 Roberto Agostino Vitillo
PR c++/30066
* c.opt (fvisi
Need to make sure that this comment is still accurate:
/* Local statics and classes get the visibility of their
containing function by default, except that
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden doesn't affect them. */
i.e. given
inline int * f() { static int i; retu
I am resubmitting the changelog since it was not respecting the conventions.
gcc/Changelog:
2011-10-21 Roberto Agostino Vitillo
PR c++/30066
* doc/invoke.texi (fvisibility-inlines-hidden): Documentation change.
gcc/c-family/Changelog:
2011-10-21 Roberto Agostino Vitillo
With this patch fvisibility-inlines-hidden affects also inline functions, e.g.:
inline void foo() {}
int main(){
foo();
return 0;
}
when compiled with -fvisibility-inlines-hidden, foo has hidden visibility:
...
10: 6 FUNCWEAK HIDDEN 6 _Z3foov
...
Tested
