Hi,
Jason Merrill ha scritto:
>I wouldn't mind mentioning dynamic_cast, along the lines that Gaby
>suggested in the PR.
Sure, but let me think about it, because isn't immediately obvious (to me at
least!) *when* that would really help.
Paolo
On 07/05/2013 08:36 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
I still consider talk of 'static_cast' in this context a non-starter.
However, maybe just saying "convert" would be OK -- though clearly
giving hints of dynamic_cast is much better.
I wouldn't mind mentioning dynamic_cast, along the lines that Gab
Hi,
On 07/05/2013 05:36 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Paolo Carlini writes:
| Hi,
|
| this issue dates back to 2004 and got stalled pretty soon. Essentially
| Gaby wanted to see *dynamic_cast* explicitly mentioned in this kind of
| diagnostic (we used to explicitly talk about static_cast), where
Paolo Carlini writes:
| Hi,
|
| this issue dates back to 2004 and got stalled pretty soon. Essentially
| Gaby wanted to see *dynamic_cast* explicitly mentioned in this kind of
| diagnostic (we used to explicitly talk about static_cast), whereas
| Mark found the current status an improvement over
Hi,
this issue dates back to 2004 and got stalled pretty soon. Essentially
Gaby wanted to see *dynamic_cast* explicitly mentioned in this kind of
diagnostic (we used to explicitly talk about static_cast), whereas Mark
found the current status an improvement over the past, proposed some
furthe
