On 8/8/19 5:41 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
these are all more or less straightforward, exploit the existing
infrastructure. Nits: the first change also removes an 'a' in the
wording because all the other error messages - a few - mentioning class
or namespace don't have it; the fixes using EX
Hi,
these are all more or less straightforward, exploit the existing
infrastructure. Nits: the first change also removes an 'a' in the
wording because all the other error messages - a few - mentioning class
or namespace don't have it; the fixes using EXPR_LOCATION also change
%qD to %qE becau
On 6/10/19 6:36 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
this one requires my last patch, uses id_loc in a few additional places
in the last part of the function.
Most of the changes should be straightforward, I only want to mention
the "typedef name may not be a nested-name-specifier" change, where, no
Hi,
this one requires my last patch, uses id_loc in a few additional places
in the last part of the function.
Most of the changes should be straightforward, I only want to mention
the "typedef name may not be a nested-name-specifier" change, where, not
using input_location means that for a t
