On 04/01/2013 01:11 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
We have an ICE for g++.dg/template/qualttp17.C. Is this something we
want to further investigate now or shall I just leave the check in?
Leave the check. The patch is OK.
Jason
Hi again
On 04/01/2013 06:55 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 04/01/2013 06:50 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 04/01/2013 12:41 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+#define DECL_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_P(NODE) \
+ (TREE_CODE (NODE) == TEMPLATE_DECL \
+ && DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (NODE) !=
Hi,
On 04/01/2013 06:50 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 04/01/2013 12:41 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+#define DECL_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_P(NODE) \
+ (TREE_CODE (NODE) == TEMPLATE_DECL \
+ && DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (NODE) != NULL_TREE\
Do we need the NULL_TREE check?
On 04/01/2013 12:41 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+#define DECL_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_P(NODE) \
+ (TREE_CODE (NODE) == TEMPLATE_DECL\
+ && DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (NODE) != NULL_TREE \
Do we need the NULL_TREE check? That is, do we st
Hi,
three items:
- Remove DECL_UNBOUND_CLASS_TEMPLATE_P, unused outside cp-tree.h.
- Use get_containing_scope in 4 places (obvious I guess)
- Use existing predicates in 2 places (likewise)
Tested x86_64-linux. Ok?
Thanks,
Paolo.
PS: In my opinion we should also rename DECL_FUNCTION_MEMBER_P to