On 11/20/19 4:40 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
while working on improving the locations of cp_build_indirect_ref_1 &
co, I noticed this nit which seems a separate issue.
In a nutshell, at variance with many other cases, in build_x_arrow we
don't immediately check for error_mark_node the retur
Hi,
while working on improving the locations of cp_build_indirect_ref_1 &
co, I noticed this nit which seems a separate issue.
In a nutshell, at variance with many other cases, in build_x_arrow we
don't immediately check for error_mark_node the return value of
decay_conversion. Then, for the
