Re: [C++ Patch/RFC] PR 80145

2017-05-08 Thread Jason Merrill via gcc-patches
OK. On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: > Hi, > > this ICE on invalid code isn't a regression, thus a patch probably doesn't > qualify for Stage 4, but IMHO I made good progress on it and I'm sending > what I have now anyway... The ICE happens during error recovery after a > sen

[C++ Patch Ping] Re: [C++ Patch/RFC] PR 80145

2017-05-08 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, gently pinging this... On 23/03/2017 20:07, Paolo Carlini wrote: Hi, this ICE on invalid code isn't a regression, thus a patch probably doesn't qualify for Stage 4, but IMHO I made good progress on it and I'm sending what I have now anyway... The ICE happens during error recovery after

[C++ Patch/RFC] PR 80145

2017-03-23 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, this ICE on invalid code isn't a regression, thus a patch probably doesn't qualify for Stage 4, but IMHO I made good progress on it and I'm sending what I have now anyway... The ICE happens during error recovery after a sensible diagnostic for the first declaration in: auto* foo() { retu