On 02/06/2014 02:59 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
- if (vec_safe_is_empty (vbases))
+ if (vbases == NULL)
vec_safe_is_empty is still more correct here.
The rest of the patch is OK.
Jason
Hi,
the last version of this work is unreviewed, should be rather
straightforward...
Paolo.
Hi,
On 02/05/2014 10:28 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/05/2014 11:19 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
if (vec_safe_is_empty (vbases))
/* No virtual bases to worry about. */;
else if (!assign_p)
{
if (constexpr_p)
*constexpr_p = false;
*constexpr_p should be false for a co
On 02/05/2014 11:19 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
if (vec_safe_is_empty (vbases))
/* No virtual bases to worry about. */;
else if (!assign_p)
{
if (constexpr_p)
*constexpr_p = false;
*constexpr_p should be false for a constructor of a class with virtual
bases, according
Hi,
On 02/04/2014 12:51 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
thus I tried to have a look to this issue, while experiencing some
weird problems with the debugger, which slowed me down a lot. I have
been able to figure out that we don't seem to actively set constexpr_p
to true anywhere in implicitly_d
Hi,
thus I tried to have a look to this issue, while experiencing some weird
problems with the debugger, which slowed me down a lot. I have been able
to figure out that we don't seem to actively set constexpr_p to true
anywhere in implicitly_declare_fn (besides the unrelated case of
inheritin
