On 10/09/2014 11:15 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I noticed today that given the actual C++11 the error messages we provide:
"constexpr constructor does not have empty body"
and:
"body of constexpr function ‘XXX’ not a return-statement"
are rather outdated and misleading. In principle we
Hi,
On 10/09/2014 04:18 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/09/2014 09:49 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 10/09/2014 03:31 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/08/2014 03:47 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
(check_constexpr_ctor_body): Use it; add bool parameter.
This function seems to only be called in o
On 10/09/2014 09:49 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 10/09/2014 03:31 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/08/2014 03:47 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
(check_constexpr_ctor_body): Use it; add bool parameter.
This function seems to only be called in one place; why add the
parameter?
Is also called re
.. a simple example in C++11 would be:
struct S
{
constexpr S() { { struct T { }; } }
};
Paolo.
Hi,
On 10/09/2014 03:31 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/08/2014 03:47 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
(check_constexpr_ctor_body): Use it; add bool parameter.
This function seems to only be called in one place; why add the parameter?
Is also called recursively by check_constexpr_ctor_body_1 and wi
On 10/08/2014 03:47 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
(check_constexpr_ctor_body): Use it; add bool parameter.
This function seems to only be called in one place; why add the parameter?
Jason
Hi,
the below tries to make progress on some relatively easy issues I
noticed while working on c++/55250. At least:
1- We rejected using declarations and using directives in constructors.
2- In C++14 mode we rejected compound-statements both in constructors
and elsewhere (and in C++11 we provi
