On 4 February 2015 at 12:22, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> I see that Jason applied the fix to mainline. Today I noticed that this is
> also a regression in the 4_9-branch: shall I regression test the fix there
> too, in case apply and close the bug?
Please do, thanks.
Hi,
On 02/02/2015 11:26 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
On 2 February 2015 at 20:50, Ville Voutilainen
wrote:
The modified test has been tested, I'm currently running the full testsuite,
so testing is incomplete. I wanted to send this in asap, since this is a
bad regression.
/cp
2015-02-02 Vill
On 2 February 2015 at 20:50, Ville Voutilainen
wrote:
> The modified test has been tested, I'm currently running the full testsuite,
> so testing is incomplete. I wanted to send this in asap, since this is a
> bad regression.
>
> /cp
> 2015-02-02 Ville Voutilainen
>
> PR c++/64901
> * d
The modified test has been tested, I'm currently running the full testsuite,
so testing is incomplete. I wanted to send this in asap, since this is a
bad regression.
/cp
2015-02-02 Ville Voutilainen
PR c++/64901
* decl.c (duplicate_decls): Also duplicate DECL_FINAL_P and DECL_OVERRIDE_
