OK.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 5:18 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The following testcase regressed for 8+, because we delayed folding in
> SAVE_EXPRs and end up passing a CONSTRUCTOR with V4SFmode and 4x 0.0
> constants in it rather than a VECTOR_CST to the middle-end folder, which
> uses real_
Hi!
The following testcase regressed for 8+, because we delayed folding in
SAVE_EXPRs and end up passing a CONSTRUCTOR with V4SFmode and 4x 0.0
constants in it rather than a VECTOR_CST to the middle-end folder, which
uses real_zerop and thus doesn't recognize the CONSTRUCTOR in
VEC_COND_EXPR as z
