On 11/27/18 5:41 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 05:20:56PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/23/18 4:15 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
On the following testcase, the call to operator () is marked as
CALL_FROM_THUNK_P and therefore genericization ignores all subtrees thereof.
Un
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 05:20:56PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 11/23/18 4:15 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On the following testcase, the call to operator () is marked as
> > CALL_FROM_THUNK_P and therefore genericization ignores all subtrees thereof.
> > Unfortunately, one of the
On 11/23/18 4:15 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
On the following testcase, the call to operator () is marked as
CALL_FROM_THUNK_P and therefore genericization ignores all subtrees thereof.
Unfortunately, one of the arguments is a move ctor call which is not itself
CALL_FROM_THUNK_P and thus we nee
Hi!
On the following testcase, the call to operator () is marked as
CALL_FROM_THUNK_P and therefore genericization ignores all subtrees thereof.
Unfortunately, one of the arguments is a move ctor call which is not itself
CALL_FROM_THUNK_P and thus we need to genericize its arguments, otherwise
we
