On 1/3/20 6:37 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On the following testcase since the split_nonconstant_init move
on the COND_EXPR with omitted middle-end operand we end up with
the operator bool called on a TARGET_EXPR in the first operand and
the same TARGET_EXPR appearing in INIT_EXPR in the second oper
Hi!
On the following testcase since the split_nonconstant_init move
on the COND_EXPR with omitted middle-end operand we end up with
the operator bool called on a TARGET_EXPR in the first operand and
the same TARGET_EXPR appearing in INIT_EXPR in the second operand.
cp_gimplify_init_expr ICEs, beca
