On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:30:31AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > The assert there assumes we never evaluate a statement list to
>> > DEBUG_BEGIN_STMT, but it breaks appart when a BIN
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:30:31AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > The assert there assumes we never evaluate a statement list to
> > DEBUG_BEGIN_STMT, but it breaks appart when a BIND_EXPR with a typedef in it
> > has some DEBUG_BEGIN_STMTs i
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> The assert there assumes we never evaluate a statement list to
> DEBUG_BEGIN_STMT, but it breaks appart when a BIND_EXPR with a typedef in it
> has some DEBUG_BEGIN_STMTs in it and nothing else (without -g it is just
> empty STATEMENT_LIST ins
Hi!
The assert there assumes we never evaluate a statement list to
DEBUG_BEGIN_STMT, but it breaks appart when a BIND_EXPR with a typedef in it
has some DEBUG_BEGIN_STMTs in it and nothing else (without -g it is just
empty STATEMENT_LIST inside of the BIND_EXPR). We want to return void_node
in th
