OK.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Apparently we can end up trying to store into a pointer-to-member
> that has a PTRMEM_CST as its current value. Later code in
> cxx_eval_store_expression is upset that it isn't a CONSTRUCTOR when
> the type is actually aggregate
Hi!
Apparently we can end up trying to store into a pointer-to-member
that has a PTRMEM_CST as its current value. Later code in
cxx_eval_store_expression is upset that it isn't a CONSTRUCTOR when
the type is actually aggregate.
The following patch fixes that, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-lin
