On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 09:51:38AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51:55AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> >> It's only safe to free the targs if they weren't used
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 09:51:38AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51:55AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> It's only safe to free the targs if they weren't used to instantiate
> >> any templates, so I lean toward option
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51:55AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> It's only safe to free the targs if they weren't used to instantiate
>> any templates, so I lean toward option #1. Did you test this with
>> strict gc?
>
> Ok, after IRC discu
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51:55AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> It's only safe to free the targs if they weren't used to instantiate
>> any templates, so I lean toward option #1. Did you test this with
>> strict gc?
>
> Ok, after IRC discu
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51:55AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> It's only safe to free the targs if they weren't used to instantiate
> any templates, so I lean toward option #1. Did you test this with
> strict gc?
Ok, after IRC discussion and another bootstrap/regtest I've installed
this variant
It's only safe to free the targs if they weren't used to instantiate any
templates, so I lean toward option #1. Did you test this with strict gc?
Jason
Hi!
fn_type_unification does:
/* We can't free this if a pending_template entry or
* last_error_tinst_level
is pointing at it. */
