On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Looks fine to me. The bit-field handling should be explained
> in the manual. Though useful, it's unusual enough that I don't
> think people will expect it (there have been bug reports or
> questions in the past about the C handling of bit-fields from
>
On 06/15/2016 01:51 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 08:08:22AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
I like the idea of being able to use the built-ins for this, but
I think it would be confusing for them to follow subtly different
rules for C than for C++. Since the value of the last arg
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 08:08:22AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> I like the idea of being able to use the built-ins for this, but
> I think it would be confusing for them to follow subtly different
> rules for C than for C++. Since the value of the last argument
Here is incremental patch to the pa
