On 10/13/2014 03:45 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg00361.html
(sorry that my message looked like I had committed as obvious)
Indeed. OK. :)
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Jason Merrill wrote:
OK.
Thanks. While commi
Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg00361.html
(sorry that my message looked like I had committed as obvious)
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Jason Merrill wrote:
OK.
Thanks. While committing, I noticed that I restricted ! to integer vectors,
where
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Jason Merrill wrote:
OK.
Thanks. While committing, I noticed that I restricted ! to integer
vectors, whereas it seems to work just fine with scalar floats, so it
would make sense to extend it to float vectors. Tested on
x86_64-linux-gnu.
2014-10-04 Marc Glisse
gcc/
OK. Sorry for the delay, please feel free to ping patches as often as
once a week.
Jason
Hello,
as discussed in the PR, I did not add a sequence point, it can be done
later if we decide so (the other direction would be bad), but if we ever
do I believe we should add one to ?: at the same time.
For the mixed 'scalar && vector', I chose to implement it with a branch,
since we can,
