On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:50:09PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > 2019-11-14 Jakub Jelinek
> >
> > * g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-pr92206-3.C: Require effective target c++14
> > rather than c++11.
>
> Thanks, and sorry for the breakage. I obviously messed something up
> during the test
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 08:44:31AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> PR c++/92206
>> * g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-pr92206-1.C: New test.
>> * g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-pr92206-2.C: Likewise.
>> * g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-pr92206-3.C: Likewise.
>
> This last t
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 08:44:31AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> PR c++/92206
> * g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-pr92206-1.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-pr92206-2.C: Likewise.
> * g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-pr92206-3.C: Likewise.
This last test FAILs with -std=c++11:
/
Jason Merrill writes:
> On 10/25/19 2:53 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> One of the changes in r277281 was to make the typedef variant
>> handling in strip_typedefs pass the raw DECL_ORIGINAL_TYPE to the
>> recursive call, instead of applying TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT first.
>> This PR shows that that int
On 10/25/19 2:53 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
One of the changes in r277281 was to make the typedef variant
handling in strip_typedefs pass the raw DECL_ORIGINAL_TYPE to the
recursive call, instead of applying TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT first.
This PR shows that that interacts badly with the implementatio
Ping
Richard Sandiford writes:
> One of the changes in r277281 was to make the typedef variant
> handling in strip_typedefs pass the raw DECL_ORIGINAL_TYPE to the
> recursive call, instead of applying TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT first.
> This PR shows that that interacts badly with the implementation
> of
One of the changes in r277281 was to make the typedef variant
handling in strip_typedefs pass the raw DECL_ORIGINAL_TYPE to the
recursive call, instead of applying TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT first.
This PR shows that that interacts badly with the implementation
of DR1558, because we then refuse to strip ali
