On 07/03/2017 12:05 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Ok. In the light of the http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg02432.html
thread, shouldn't this be structured binding declaration then?
I.e.
Yes, I think that's better, thanks!
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 01:38:13PM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 06/30/2017 01:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > The initializer for structured binding has to be one of:
> > = assignment-expression
> > ( assignment-expression )
> > { assignment-expression }
> > but cp_parser_initializer can pa
On 06/30/2017 01:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
The initializer for structured binding has to be one of:
= assignment-expression
( assignment-expression )
{ assignment-expression }
but cp_parser_initializer can parse other forms, with fewer or more
expressions in there. Some cases we caught with v
Hi!
The initializer for structured binding has to be one of:
= assignment-expression
( assignment-expression )
{ assignment-expression }
but cp_parser_initializer can parse other forms, with fewer or more
expressions in there. Some cases we caught with various cryptic errors
or pedwarns, but othe
