On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> This needs some C++ tests, particularly with templates and range-for. I
>> suspect that using the pragma in a template will ICE.
>
> No, that wasn't the case, but the combination template/range-for was indeed
> not working; fixed by adding
> This needs some C++ tests, particularly with templates and range-for. I
> suspect that using the pragma in a template will ICE.
No, that wasn't the case, but the combination template/range-for was indeed
not working; fixed by adding a 5th parameter to the RANGE_FOR_STMT node.
Tested on x86_64
On 12/06/2017 03:50 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
this is the (hopefully) final implementation of the support for the unrolling
pragma in the C++ front-end.
This needs some C++ tests, particularly with templates and range-for. I
suspect that using the pragma in a template will ICE.
Jason
Ping for the last missing bits of the #pragma GCC unroll support:
> this is the (hopefully) final implementation of the support for the
> unrolling pragma in the C++ front-end.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg00298.html
Thanks in advance.
--
Eric Botcazou
Hi,
this is the (hopefully) final implementation of the support for the unrolling
pragma in the C++ front-end. The only change is the handling of USHRT_MAX as
unrolling factor which is now rejected (USHRT_MAX - 1 is the new upper bound).
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK for the mainline?
2017
