On 08/02/15 23:44, Jason Merrill wrote:
It seems to me that DR 1658 ignores vbases of abstract classes for determining
whether a destructor is deleted, but says nothing about exception
specifications.
DR 1351 specifically ignores vbases of abstract classes for determining the
exception specifi
On 08/01/2015 07:31 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Ok, this patch fixes things up. The previous version was a little too
lax, extending the logic of DR1611 to all synthesized functions.
However, this broke virtual synthesized dtors, in that an abstract
class's synthesized dtor's exception specificati
On 07/17/15 15:59, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 07/17/15 15:42, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 07/08/2015 10:50 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 06/30/15 19:21, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 06/30/15 00:19, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/29/2015 06:57 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
* method.c (synthesized_method_wal
On 07/17/15 15:42, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 07/08/2015 10:50 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 06/30/15 19:21, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 06/30/15 00:19, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/29/2015 06:57 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
* method.c (synthesized_method_walk): Skip virtual bases of
abstract cla
On 07/08/2015 10:50 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 06/30/15 19:21, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 06/30/15 00:19, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/29/2015 06:57 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
* method.c (synthesized_method_walk): Skip virtual bases of
abstract classes in C++14 mode.
Let's not limit thi
On 06/30/15 19:21, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 06/30/15 00:19, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/29/2015 06:57 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
* method.c (synthesized_method_walk): Skip virtual bases of
abstract classes in C++14 mode.
Let's not limit this to C++14 mode; most DRs apply to earlier stan
