On 2/9/2014 3:10 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Which testsuite do you mean? I did test this with Ada enabled
and there were no regressions.
If you mean an external testsuite then I certainly don't mind
holding off the Ada part. I hope the non-Ada part could still
go in without it though.
I m
Robert Dewar writes:
> On 2/9/2014 3:03 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> This switches Ada from using [enabled by default] to [warning enabled
>> by default] for consistency with:
>>
>>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00549.html
>>
>> Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK if the above pat
> This switches Ada from using [enabled by default] to [warning enabled
> by default] for consistency with:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00549.html
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK if the above patch goes in?
As I just mentioned, this isn't OK at first sight.
Arno
On 2/9/2014 3:03 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This switches Ada from using [enabled by default] to [warning enabled
by default] for consistency with:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00549.html
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK if the above patch goes in?
I would say hold off on
This switches Ada from using [enabled by default] to [warning enabled
by default] for consistency with:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00549.html
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK if the above patch goes in?
Thanks,
Richard
gcc/ada/
* erroutc.adb (Output_Msg_Text): Use "[
