On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> Committed on trunk now. Sorry for the breakage, my build was incremental
> and missed this missing part.
Great. Thanks for the quick fix!
Diego.
> Testing the patch below, will commit if success.
>
> 2012-10-29 Arnaud Charlet
>
>* gcc-interface/Makefile.in (s-oscons.ads): Adjust call to
>xoscons.
Committed on trunk now. Sorry for the breakage, my build was incremental
and missed this missing part.
Arno
> > We chatted about this on IRC, and Richi is seeing the same problem on
> > his builds.
>
> Very strange. I'm looking at it.
OK, this comes from code duplicated between gcc-interface/Makefile.in and
Make-generated.in, pretty messy.
Testing the patch below, will commit if success.
2012-10-29
> I have no directory called gcc/ada/bldtools/oscons/xoscons. That's an
> executable.
Yes, that's as expected, I asked you to check the timestamp of this file.
> Still happens with -j1 (after starting from scratch), so it's probably
> not a parallel make issue.
Right, no surprise here.
> We ch
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>> Yup, it does:
>
> OK then can you check the timestamp of ./gcc/ada/bldtools/oscons/xoscons
> vs e.g. ./gcc/ada/bldtools/oscons/xoscons/xoscons.adb and
> $(srcdir)/gcc/ada/xoscons.adb?
I have no directory called gcc/ada/bldtools/oscons/xos
> Yup, it does:
OK then can you check the timestamp of ./gcc/ada/bldtools/oscons/xoscons
vs e.g. ./gcc/ada/bldtools/oscons/xoscons/xoscons.adb and
$(srcdir)/gcc/ada/xoscons.adb?
Arno
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>>> >> Well, this was a build from scratch. Maybe there is a parallel make
>>> >> bug in the new ada changes? Some undeclared dependency?
>>> >
>>> > There is not in the recent chang
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>> >> Well, this was a build from scratch. Maybe there is a parallel make
>> >> bug in the new ada changes? Some undeclared dependency?
>> >
>> > There is not in the recent changes. Maybe there's a latent bug, although I
>> > have never exp
> >> Well, this was a build from scratch. Maybe there is a parallel make
> >> bug in the new ada changes? Some undeclared dependency?
> >
> > There is not in the recent changes. Maybe there's a latent bug, although I
> > have never experienced it.
> >
> > At which revision are you?
>
> rev 19294
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>> Well, this was a build from scratch. Maybe there is a parallel make
>> bug in the new ada changes? Some undeclared dependency?
>
> There is not in the recent changes. Maybe there's a latent bug, although I
> have never experienced it.
>
> Well, this was a build from scratch. Maybe there is a parallel make
> bug in the new ada changes? Some undeclared dependency?
There is not in the recent changes. Maybe there's a latent bug, although I
have never experienced it.
At which revision are you?
Arno
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>> After updating my tree to rev 192942 this morning, I'm getting a
>> bootstrap failure with ada enabled:
>
> Looks like make did not rebuild (or too late?) xoscons.
>
> I'd suggest doing a rm -rf gcc/ada/bldtools from your obj directory and
> After updating my tree to rev 192942 this morning, I'm getting a
> bootstrap failure with ada enabled:
Looks like make did not rebuild (or too late?) xoscons.
I'd suggest doing a rm -rf gcc/ada/bldtools from your obj directory and
see if this fixes the error.
If not, you might need to do a mak
Arnaud,
After updating my tree to rev 192942 this morning, I'm getting a
bootstrap failure with ada enabled:
raised CONSTRAINT_ERROR : a-comlin.adb:65 explicit raise
make[6]: *** [rts/s-oscons.ads] Error 1
make[6]: Leaving directory `bld-gcc/gcc/ada'
make[5]: *** [gnatlib-shared-default] Error 2
Normally pragma Optimize_Alignment (Space) forces an alignment of 1
for any packed record, but we can't do that for a variable length
record, since we can't implement that case, so ignore the pragma
in this case with a warning.
The following test program shows the patch in action:
1. pragma
15 matches
Mail list logo
