Ramana Radhakrishnan writes:
> On 20 September 2011 09:38, Richard Sandiford
>> Otherwise, all expanders use expandable_comparison_operator instead.
>> This restores the previous behaviour for them, and I went through each
>> one to try to make sure that it was handled correctly.
>>
>> Tested on a
On 20 September 2011 09:38, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> My fix for PR49030 had the unintended side-effect of forcing libcalls
> to be used for some DImode comparisons. The problem (which I should
> have noticed at the time, sorry) is that arm_comparison_operator is
> used for both expanders and in
My fix for PR49030 had the unintended side-effect of forcing libcalls
to be used for some DImode comparisons. The problem (which I should
have noticed at the time, sorry) is that arm_comparison_operator is
used for both expanders and insns. The patch fixed the definition
for insns, but made it to
