On 4 July 2016 at 18:28, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
>
> On 22/06/16 16:52, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a new attempt at removing neon-testgen.ml and generated files.
>>
>> Compared to my previous version several months ago:
>> - I have recently added testcases to m
Hi Christophe,
On 22/06/16 16:52, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi,
This is a new attempt at removing neon-testgen.ml and generated files.
Compared to my previous version several months ago:
- I have recently added testcases to make sure we do not lose coverage
as described in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/
ping ^2 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01615.html
On 27 June 2016 at 12:54, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> ping?
>
> On 22 June 2016 at 17:52, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a new attempt at removing neon-testgen.ml and generated files.
>>
>> Compared to my previous versi
ping?
On 22 June 2016 at 17:52, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a new attempt at removing neon-testgen.ml and generated files.
>
> Compared to my previous version several months ago:
> - I have recently added testcases to make sure we do not lose coverage
> as described in
> https://gcc.
Hi,
This is a new attempt at removing neon-testgen.ml and generated files.
Compared to my previous version several months ago:
- I have recently added testcases to make sure we do not lose coverage
as described in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02922.html
- I now also remove neon.m
