On 12/09/14 11:13, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 09/09/14 16:14, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
As Christophe mentioned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00202.html
These tests fail on big-endian. The reason is that the input is not
aligned to 128 bit forcing the use of a movmisali
On 09/09/14 16:14, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As Christophe mentioned at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00202.html
> These tests fail on big-endian. The reason is that the input is not
> aligned to 128 bit forcing the use of a movmisalign which we don't
> support on bi
On 09/09/14 16:14, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
As Christophe mentioned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00202.html
These tests fail on big-endian. The reason is that the input is not
aligned to 128 bit forcing the use of a movmisalign which we don't
support on big-endian.
A
Hi all,
As Christophe mentioned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00202.html
These tests fail on big-endian. The reason is that the input is not
aligned to 128 bit forcing the use of a movmisalign which we don't
support on big-endian.
A solution is to force the alignment of th