On 6 September 2013 11:45, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> The signed variants of the qtbl and qtbx intrinsics currently
> take an int8x<8,16> for their control vector parameter.
> This should be a uint8x<8,16> parameter.
>
> Fixed as attached and checked against aarch64.exp on aarch64-none-elf
> with
Hi,
The signed variants of the qtbl and qtbx intrinsics currently
take an int8x<8,16> for their control vector parameter.
This should be a uint8x<8,16> parameter.
Fixed as attached and checked against aarch64.exp on aarch64-none-elf
with no regressions.
Is this OK to commit?
I have some simila
