On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 10:19 AM Andre Vieira (lists)
wrote:
>
> Thank you both!
>
> Here is a reworked version, this OK for trunk?
Looks good to me.
Richard.
Thank you both!
Here is a reworked version, this OK for trunk?diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-builtins.c
b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-builtins.c
index
a815e4cfbccab692ca688ba87c71b06c304abbfb..e06131a7c61d31c1be3278dcdccc49c3053c78cb
100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-builtins.c
+
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 6:49 PM Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> "Andre Vieira (lists)" writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This should address the ubsan bootstrap build and big-endian testisms
> > reported against the last NEON load/store gimple lowering patch. I also
> > fixed a follow-up issue
"Andre Vieira (lists)" writes:
> Hi,
>
> This should address the ubsan bootstrap build and big-endian testisms
> reported against the last NEON load/store gimple lowering patch. I also
> fixed a follow-up issue where the alias information was leading to a bad
> codegen transformation. The NEON
Hi,
This should address the ubsan bootstrap build and big-endian testisms
reported against the last NEON load/store gimple lowering patch. I also
fixed a follow-up issue where the alias information was leading to a bad
codegen transformation. The NEON intrinsics specifications do not forbid
t
