On 8 December 2017 at 17:05, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Christophe Lyon writes:
>> Hi Richard,
>> On 7 December 2017 at 10:31, James Greenhalgh
>> wrote>> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 05:57:37PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Three related regression fixes:
- We can't use asserts lik
Christophe Lyon writes:
> Hi Richard,
> On 7 December 2017 at 10:31, James Greenhalgh
> wrote>> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 05:57:37PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> Three related regression fixes:
>>>
>>> - We can't use asserts like:
>>>
>>> gcc_assert (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) == 16);
>>>
>>>
Hi Richard,
On 7 December 2017 at 10:31, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 05:57:37PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Three related regression fixes:
>>
>> - We can't use asserts like:
>>
>> gcc_assert (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) == 16);
>>
>> in aarch64_print_operand because
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 05:57:37PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Three related regression fixes:
>
> - We can't use asserts like:
>
> gcc_assert (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) == 16);
>
> in aarch64_print_operand because it could trigger for invalid user input.
>
> - The output_operand_lossage
Three related regression fixes:
- We can't use asserts like:
gcc_assert (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) == 16);
in aarch64_print_operand because it could trigger for invalid user input.
- The output_operand_lossage in aarch64_print_address_internal:
output_operand_lossage ("invalid operand for
