On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> Richard Biener writes:
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> @@ -2070,8 +2143,7 @@ vect_find_same_alignment_d
Richard Biener writes:
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Richard Biener writes:
>>> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Richard Sandiford
>>> wrote:
@@ -2070,8 +2143,7 @@ vect_find_same_alignment_drs (struct dat
if (dra == drb)
return;
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> @@ -2070,8 +2143,7 @@ vect_find_same_alignment_drs (struct dat
>>>if (dra == drb)
>>> return;
>>>
>>> - if (!operand_equal_p (DR_BASE_OBJ
Richard Biener writes:
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> @@ -2070,8 +2143,7 @@ vect_find_same_alignment_drs (struct dat
>>if (dra == drb)
>> return;
>>
>> - if (!operand_equal_p (DR_BASE_OBJECT (dra), DR_BASE_OBJECT (drb),
>> - OEP_ADD
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> This patch is a follow-on to the fix for PR81136. The testcase for that
> PR shows that we can (correctly) calculate different base alignments
> for two data_references but still tell that their misalignments wrt the
> vector size are equ
This patch is a follow-on to the fix for PR81136. The testcase for that
PR shows that we can (correctly) calculate different base alignments
for two data_references but still tell that their misalignments wrt the
vector size are equal. This is because we calculate the base alignments
for each dr
