Re: [4.7] Fix a couple of C++isms

2013-04-21 Thread Eric Botcazou
> Umm, I thought declaring at first use (or near first use) was one of the > approved C++-isms? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CppConventions You probably missed the [4.7] in the subject. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: [4.7] Fix a couple of C++isms

2013-04-21 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 04/21/2013 01:59 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: >> >> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied as obvious. >> >> >> 2013-04-21 Eric Botcazou >> >> * cfgexpand.c (avoid_complex_debug_insns): Fix C++ism. >> cp/ >> * parse

Re: [4.7] Fix a couple of C++isms

2013-04-21 Thread Jeff Law
On 04/21/2013 01:59 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied as obvious. 2013-04-21 Eric Botcazou * cfgexpand.c (avoid_complex_debug_insns): Fix C++ism. cp/ * parser.c (cp_parser_late_return_type_opt): Likewise. Umm, I thought declaring a

[4.7] Fix a couple of C++isms

2013-04-21 Thread Eric Botcazou
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied as obvious. 2013-04-21 Eric Botcazou * cfgexpand.c (avoid_complex_debug_insns): Fix C++ism. cp/ * parser.c (cp_parser_late_return_type_opt): Likewise. -- Eric BotcazouIndex: cp/parser.c ===