Richard Henderson writes:
> On 03/31/2011 01:09 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> I think the assert should be retained (for now) as
>>>
>>> gcc_assert (nops == 4 || nops == 6);
>>>
>>> at least until we add such verification to some genfoo.
>>
>> After the patch we have:
>>
>> gcc_assert (no
On 03/31/2011 01:09 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> I think the assert should be retained (for now) as
>>
>> gcc_assert (nops == 4 || nops == 6);
>>
>> at least until we add such verification to some genfoo.
>
> After the patch we have:
>
> gcc_assert (nops == (unsigned int) insn_data[(int) i
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 03/31/2011 09:23 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> +++ gcc/expr.c 2011-03-31 16:49:06.0 +0100
>> @@ -1293,11 +1293,7 @@ emit_block_move_via_movmem (rtx x, rtx y
>> nice if there were some way to inform the backend, so
>> that it doesn'
On 03/31/2011 09:23 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> +++ gcc/expr.c2011-03-31 16:49:06.0 +0100
> @@ -1293,11 +1293,7 @@ emit_block_move_via_movmem (rtx x, rtx y
>nice if there were some way to inform the backend, so
>that it doesn't fail the expansion because i
This patch makes use of the new n_generator_args field.
Bboostrapped & regressions-tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. Also tested by
building cc1 for arm-linux-gnueabi, mips-elf, spu-elf.
Richard
gcc/
* expr.c (emit_block_move_via_movmem): Use n_generator_args
instead of n_operands.
