On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> This patch converts more places that could use int_mode_for_size instead
> of mode_for_size. This is in preparation for an upcoming patch that
> makes mode_for_size itself return an opt_mode.
>
> require () seems like the right choice in
This patch converts more places that could use int_mode_for_size instead
of mode_for_size. This is in preparation for an upcoming patch that
makes mode_for_size itself return an opt_mode.
require () seems like the right choice in expand_builtin_powi
because we have got past the point of backing o
