Joseph Myers writes:
> On Wed, 14 May 2025, Sam James wrote:
>
>> > (cherry picked from commit 3d525fce70fa0ffa0b22af6e213643e1ceca5ab5)
>> > ---
>> > As discussed on the PR, I feel like this is worth having for 14 as we're
>> > asking upstreams to try reproduce issues w/ -std=gnu23 (or -std=c23)
On Wed, 14 May 2025, Sam James wrote:
> > (cherry picked from commit 3d525fce70fa0ffa0b22af6e213643e1ceca5ab5)
> > ---
> > As discussed on the PR, I feel like this is worth having for 14 as we're
> > asking upstreams to try reproduce issues w/ -std=gnu23 (or -std=c23) if
> > they don't have access
Sam James writes:
> From: Joseph Myers
>
> As reported in bug 112556, GCC wrongly rejects conversion of null
> pointer constants with bool or enum type to pointers in
> convert_for_assignment (assignment, initialization, argument passing,
> return). Fix the code there to allow BOOLEAN_TYPE and
From: Joseph Myers
As reported in bug 112556, GCC wrongly rejects conversion of null
pointer constants with bool or enum type to pointers in
convert_for_assignment (assignment, initialization, argument passing,
return). Fix the code there to allow BOOLEAN_TYPE and ENUMERAL_TYPE;
it already allow
