On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:28 PM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Although the first pattern match wins in the sense that no later
> function can match the *old* gimple statement, it still seems worth
> letting them match the *new* gimple statements, just like we would if
> the original IR had include
Although the first pattern match wins in the sense that no later
function can match the *old* gimple statement, it still seems worth
letting them match the *new* gimple statements, just like we would if
the original IR had included that sequence from the outset.
This is mostly true after the later
