On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> This patch converts more places that could use int_mode_for_mode
> instead of mode_for_size. This is in preparation for an upcoming
> patch that makes mode_for_size itself return an opt_mode.
>
> The reason for using required () in exp2_i
This patch converts more places that could use int_mode_for_mode
instead of mode_for_size. This is in preparation for an upcoming
patch that makes mode_for_size itself return an opt_mode.
The reason for using required () in exp2_immediate_p is that
we go on to do:
trunc_int_for_mode (..., in