Bernd Schmidt writes:
> On 07/06/11 20:06, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Bernd Schmidt writes:
>>> At some point we've grown a shift_truncation_mask hook, but we're not
>>> using it everywhere we're masking shift counts. This patch changes the
>>> instances I found.
>>
>> The documentation reads:
On 07/06/11 20:06, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Bernd Schmidt writes:
>> At some point we've grown a shift_truncation_mask hook, but we're not
>> using it everywhere we're masking shift counts. This patch changes the
>> instances I found.
>
> The documentation reads:
>
> Note that, unlike @code{S
Bernd Schmidt writes:
> At some point we've grown a shift_truncation_mask hook, but we're not
> using it everywhere we're masking shift counts. This patch changes the
> instances I found.
The documentation reads:
Note that, unlike @code{SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED}, this function does
@emph{not} app
On 07/01/2011 10:27 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> * simplify-rtx.c (simplify_const_binary_operation): Use the
> shift_truncation_mask hook instead of performing modulo by
> width. Compare against mode precision, not bitsize.
> * combine.c (combine_simplify_rtx, simplify_shift_
At some point we've grown a shift_truncation_mask hook, but we're not
using it everywhere we're masking shift counts. This patch changes the
instances I found.
Bernd
* simplify-rtx.c (simplify_const_binary_operation): Use the
shift_truncation_mask hook instead of performing modulo
