On 06/25/2015 11:33 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jeff Law writes:
On 06/25/2015 03:49 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 06/24/2015 02:23 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jeff Law writes:
So I'm holding off on approving this one pending further dis
Jeff Law writes:
> On 06/25/2015 03:49 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 06/24/2015 02:23 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jeff Law writes:
>
> So I'm holding off on approving this one pending further discussion of
> the use of
On 06/25/2015 03:49 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 06/24/2015 02:23 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jeff Law writes:
So I'm holding off on approving this one pending further discussion of
the use of multiple inheritance for nofree_ptr_hash.
I
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 06/24/2015 02:23 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>
>> Jeff Law writes:
>>>
>>> So I'm holding off on approving this one pending further discussion of
>>> the use of multiple inheritance for nofree_ptr_hash.
>>
>>
>> I thought that might be contr
On 06/24/2015 02:23 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jeff Law writes:
So I'm holding off on approving this one pending further discussion of
the use of multiple inheritance for nofree_ptr_hash.
I thought that might be controversial. :-) My two main defences are:
1) This is multiple inheritance
Jeff Law writes:
> On 06/16/2015 02:55 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> This patch stops pointer_hash from inheriting typed_noop_remove and
>> instead creates a new class nofree_ptr_hash that inherits from both.
>> It then updates all uses of typed_noop_remove (which are all pointers)
>> and pointe
On 06/16/2015 02:55 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This patch stops pointer_hash from inheriting typed_noop_remove and
instead creates a new class nofree_ptr_hash that inherits from both.
It then updates all uses of typed_noop_remove (which are all pointers)
and pointer_hash so that they use this n
This patch stops pointer_hash from inheriting typed_noop_remove and
instead creates a new class nofree_ptr_hash that inherits from both.
It then updates all uses of typed_noop_remove (which are all pointers)
and pointer_hash so that they use this new class instead.
gcc/
* hash-table.h: Upd
