On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
> We speculate an insn in the PR but we do not make a check for it though we
> should. The thing that broke this was the fix for PR 45472. In that pr, we
> have moved a volatile insn too far up because we failed to merge the bits
> describing its vol
Hello,
We speculate an insn in the PR but we do not make a check for it though we
should. The thing that broke this was the fix for PR 45472. In that pr,
we have moved a volatile insn too far up because we failed to merge the
bits describing its volatility when we have processed a control fl
