Re: [0/10] Replace host_integerp and tree_low_cst

2013-11-18 Thread Richard Sandiford
Richard Biener writes: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Richard Sandiford > wrote: >> Jeff Law writes: >>> On 11/16/13 05:53, Richard Sandiford wrote: After the patch that went in yesterday, all calls to host_integerp and tree_low_cst pass a constant "pos" argument. This series rep

Re: [0/10] Replace host_integerp and tree_low_cst

2013-11-18 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Jeff Law writes: >> On 11/16/13 05:53, Richard Sandiford wrote: >>> After the patch that went in yesterday, all calls to host_integerp and >>> tree_low_cst pass a constant "pos" argument. This series replaces each >>> function with two

Re: [0/10] Replace host_integerp and tree_low_cst

2013-11-18 Thread Richard Sandiford
Jeff Law writes: > On 11/16/13 05:53, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> After the patch that went in yesterday, all calls to host_integerp and >> tree_low_cst pass a constant "pos" argument. This series replaces each >> function with two separate ones: > [ ... ] > So I've almost entirely ignored the wh

Re: [0/10] Replace host_integerp and tree_low_cst

2013-11-17 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/16/13 05:53, Richard Sandiford wrote: After the patch that went in yesterday, all calls to host_integerp and tree_low_cst pass a constant "pos" argument. This series replaces each function with two separate ones: [ ... ] So I've almost entirely ignored the whole wide-int conversion discus

[0/10] Replace host_integerp and tree_low_cst

2013-11-16 Thread Richard Sandiford
After the patch that went in yesterday, all calls to host_integerp and tree_low_cst pass a constant "pos" argument. This series replaces each function with two separate ones: host_integerp (x, 0) -> tree_fits_shwi_p (x) host_integerp (x, 1) -> tree_fits_uhwi_p (x) tree_low_cst (x, 0) -> tre