Re: *Ping* Re: [PATCH] PR c/43673 - Incorrect warning in dfp printf.

2019-05-31 Thread Jeff Law
On 5/23/19 4:26 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Tue, 21 May 2019, Jeff Law wrote: > >> On 5/20/19 6:56 PM, luoxhu wrote: >>> Ping for GCC-10. >> I thought this was a NAK in its current form. >> >> See Ryan's c#1 in the BZ. > > I don't see that as relevant to this bug report. > > That comment is abo

Re: *Ping* Re: [PATCH] PR c/43673 - Incorrect warning in dfp printf.

2019-05-23 Thread Joseph Myers
On Tue, 21 May 2019, Jeff Law wrote: > On 5/20/19 6:56 PM, luoxhu wrote: > > Ping for GCC-10. > I thought this was a NAK in its current form. > > See Ryan's c#1 in the BZ. I don't see that as relevant to this bug report. That comment is about the question of how GCC can know whether libc's pri

Re: *Ping* Re: [PATCH] PR c/43673 - Incorrect warning in dfp printf.

2019-05-21 Thread Jeff Law
On 5/20/19 6:56 PM, luoxhu wrote: > Ping for GCC-10. I thought this was a NAK in its current form. See Ryan's c#1 in the BZ. jeff

Re: *Ping* Re: [PATCH] PR c/43673 - Incorrect warning in dfp printf.

2019-05-20 Thread luoxhu
Ping for GCC-10. Thanks Xionghu On 2019/3/4 09:13, Xiong Hu Luo wrote: Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg01949.html Thanks Xionghu On 2019/2/26 AM9:13, luo...@linux.ibm.com wrote: From: Xiong Hu Luo dfp printf/scanf of Ha/HA, Da/DA and DDa/DDA is not set properly, cause

*Ping* Re: [PATCH] PR c/43673 - Incorrect warning in dfp printf.

2019-03-03 Thread Xiong Hu Luo
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg01949.html Thanks Xionghu On 2019/2/26 AM9:13, luo...@linux.ibm.com wrote: > From: Xiong Hu Luo > > dfp printf/scanf of Ha/HA, Da/DA and DDa/DDA is not set properly, cause > incorrect warning happens: > "use of 'D' length modifier with 'a' typ