On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 23:41 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/29/14 12:07, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes: I made various mistakes in reorg.c and resource.c where I assumed
> > that a JUMP_LABEL(insn) was an insn, whereas the existing code is set up
> > to handle RETURN nodes.
> Well, it would se
On 08/29/14 12:07, David Malcolm wrote:
Yes: I made various mistakes in reorg.c and resource.c where I assumed
that a JUMP_LABEL(insn) was an insn, whereas the existing code is set up
to handle RETURN nodes.
Well, it would seem to me that reorg is being totally braindead in
mixing and matching
> From: David Malcolm
> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 20:07:04 +0200
> BTW, in another email in the thread you said:
>
> > Thanks for the heads-up. BTW, the ChangeLog entries should say
> > "what" not "why"; that goes into a comment in the source.
>
> OK. Where possible I've added comments in the n
On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 18:15 +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > From: David Malcolm
> > Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:33:54 +0200
>
> > On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 16:48 +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > > Sorry, but that didn't help. I still get the exact same error.
> > > (Yep, I double-checked that
> From: David Malcolm
> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:33:54 +0200
> On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 16:48 +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > Sorry, but that didn't help. I still get the exact same error.
> > (Yep, I double-checked that I didn't goof testing...)
Famous last words...
> Fully identical, or j
On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 16:48 +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > From: David Malcolm
> > Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:26:59 +0200
> > On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 06:13 +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > > /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/cris-elf/gccobj/./gcc/xgcc
> > > -B/tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/cris-elf/gccobj/./gcc/
> From: David Malcolm
> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:26:59 +0200
> On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 06:13 +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/cris-elf/gccobj/./gcc/xgcc
> > -B/tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/cris-elf/gccobj/./gcc/ -nostdinc
> > -B/tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/cris-elf/gccobj/cris-elf/newlib/
> From: David Malcolm
> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:40:49 +0200
> > Patch attached, which fixes the above testcase; bootstrap in progress:
> >
> > gcc/
> > * resource.h (mark_target_live_regs): Undo erroneous conversion
> > of second param of r214693, converting it back from rtx_insn * to
On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 07:26 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 06:13 +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > Sorry for the context-less mail but I didn't find a proper
> > obvious gcc-patches-message to reply to. (Also, I can't log
> > into bugzilla because to enter a PR as there app
On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 06:13 +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> Sorry for the context-less mail but I didn't find a proper
> obvious gcc-patches-message to reply to. (Also, I can't log
> into bugzilla because to enter a PR as there appears to have
> been some SSL changes such that my old firefox an
Sorry for the context-less mail but I didn't find a proper
obvious gcc-patches-message to reply to. (Also, I can't log
into bugzilla because to enter a PR as there appears to have
been some SSL changes such that my old firefox and gcc.gnu.org
can no longer agree on a cipher or something.) But, si
11 matches
Mail list logo
